High courts rule railway accident compensation cannot be denied solely for missing tickets

Kush Singh25 August 20262 min read88 viewsAccidents
High courts rule railway accident compensation cannot be denied solely for missing tickets

Multiple High Courts across India including recent rulings from Punjab and Haryana, Allahabad, and Delhi have established that railway accident compensation cannot be denied to dependents solely because a train ticket was not recovered from the deceased. The judiciary has increasingly categorized the Railways Act of 1989 as beneficial welfare legislation, asserting that the absence of a ticket does not automatically negate a claim for compensation.

Key takeaways from recent judicial rulings:
• Punjab and Haryana High Court awarded ₹8 lakh on August 24, 2026, to parents of a man who died in 2016 after falling from a running train.
• Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench overturned a 2017 Railway Claims Tribunal order on August 18-19, 2026, awarding ₹8 lakh to a widow.
• Delhi High Court ruled on August 17, 2026, that a fatal fall while reboarding a crowded train constitutes an untoward incident.
• Supreme Court emphasized the no-fault liability nature of Section 124A, stating claimant affidavits can establish bona fide travel.

Punjab and Haryana High Court Ruling Details


Justice Harkesh Manuja criticized the Divisional Railway Manager inquiry for failing to investigate the case beyond the missing ticket. The court noted that the Railways neglected to interview the Guard, Ticket Examiner, or fellow passengers. The court mandated the payment of the ₹8 lakh compensation with 9% annual interest from the date of the claim filing, stipulating an increase to 12% if unpaid after eight weeks.

Allahabad and Delhi High Court Decisions


Similarly, Justice Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi of the Allahabad High Court affirmed that while claimants must prove bona fide travel, a missing ticket is not definitive proof of ticketless travel. Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court clarified that falling while reboarding a crowded train qualifies legally as an untoward incident under the Railways Act.

Supreme Court Stance and Compensation Rules


The Supreme Court of India recently reinforced these principles through Justices Sanjay Karol and N. Kotiswar Singh. The apex court noted that an affidavit from a claimant can suffice to establish bona fide travel, shifting the burden of proof to the Railways to provide evidence to the contrary. These judicial shifts follow the 2017 amendment to the Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents Compensation Rules which raised death compensation from ₹4 lakh to ₹8 lakh. While current compensation for accidents can reach ₹18 lakh including insurance, the Jan Vishwas Amendment of Provisions Act 2026, effective July 1, 2026, simultaneously increased the penalty for ticketless travel to a minimum of ₹500 plus the actual fare.

HelloRail की हर खबर सबसे पहलेJoin Channel
Share:

Comments

Leave a comment